Radiometric dating disproved

While the second and third assumptions have always been a bit troublesome, especially the third assumption, which considers the original constitution of a particular specimen, the first assumption was thought to be a pretty safe bet since scientists were not able to vary the decay rates much in a lab. Carl Wieland explains, “When uranium decays to lead, a by-product of this process is the formation of helium, a very light, inert gas which readily escapes from rock.

There should surely be hardly any left, because with such a slow buildup, it should be seeping out continually and not accumulating.Question: "How does radiometric dating fit with the view of a young earth?" Answer: Radiometric dating does not fit with the “young earth” view.How does the geologic timescale fit with the view of a young earth? It’s a site that pumps out creationist commentary at such a rate that there’s already enough there to keep me occupied for many moons.

Search for radiometric dating disproved:

radiometric dating disproved-16radiometric dating disproved-85radiometric dating disproved-83

There still remains a lot of research to do, but, as it currently stands, the accuracy of radiometric dating remains ambiguously suspect at best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “radiometric dating disproved”

  1. The term's meanings changed in the early 20th century when American social scientists, beginning with Thorstein Veblen, translated ideas from the German concept of Technik into "technology." In German and other European languages, a distinction exists between technik and technologie that is absent in English, which usually translates both terms as "technology." By the 1930s, "technology" referred not only to the study of the industrial arts but to the industrial arts themselves.