Radiometric dating disproved
While the second and third assumptions have always been a bit troublesome, especially the third assumption, which considers the original constitution of a particular specimen, the first assumption was thought to be a pretty safe bet since scientists were not able to vary the decay rates much in a lab. Carl Wieland explains, “When uranium decays to lead, a by-product of this process is the formation of helium, a very light, inert gas which readily escapes from rock.
There should surely be hardly any left, because with such a slow buildup, it should be seeping out continually and not accumulating.Question: "How does radiometric dating fit with the view of a young earth?" Answer: Radiometric dating does not fit with the “young earth” view.How does the geologic timescale fit with the view of a young earth? It’s a site that pumps out creationist commentary at such a rate that there’s already enough there to keep me occupied for many moons.
Search for radiometric dating disproved:
There still remains a lot of research to do, but, as it currently stands, the accuracy of radiometric dating remains ambiguously suspect at best.